Skip to main content

ELI5: ETF Basics



Last week, we talked about how ETFs are not breaking the market. Today, let's take a step back and discuss some ETF basics, like the players involved, how they're created and how pricing works. But first, what exactly is an ETF?

ETF?

ETF stands for exchange-traded fund, they are funds that trade on an exchange (aptly named). An ETF tracks a sector or index by holding the underlying assets. The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) for example, holds the 500 largest US stocks to track the S&P. This is one of the major benefits of ETFs, it allows you to own hundreds, even thousands of assets in a single fund.

ETFs can hold stocks, bonds, commodities or even a mix. An ETF is essentially an asset-filled "basket". Some baskets are pretty plain (such as VOO), some are more out there, such as the The Obesity ETF (SLIM) which holds and tracks companies profiting from the obesity epidemic. There's a basket for everything.

The ETF Provider and Authorized Participant 

The ETF Provider designs, brands and issues the fund. They come up with the themes, strategies and ultimately the assets held. The biggest providers are BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street. The ETF Provider makes money through the fund's management fee. The more money invested in their fund, the more money they'll make.

The Authorized Participant is responsible for buying the assets held in the fund. They are usually a large financial institution (i.e Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, etc.) that have a lot of buying power. They profit through an arbitrage (fancy word for price differences) process we'll discuss below.

The Creation & Redemption Process

To create new ETF shares, the Authorized Participant will buy the underlying assets and deliver them to the ETF Provider. In exchange, the Authorized Participant receives a block of ETF shares of equal value to the assets they delivered.

To think of it simply, the Authorized Participant delivers assets to the ETF Provider, the ETF Provider puts them in baskets, then gives those baskets back to the Authorized Participant to sell in the market. This is the creation process.

The process can also happen in reverse, where the Authorized Participant trades ETF shares back to the ETF Provider for the assets alone. This is the redemption process.

Price Correction Mechanism 

ETFs should reflect the value of the assets they hold. However, trading can cause fluctuations in an ETF's price and can lead to mispricing, where the basket of assets is valued differently than the assets themselves. This mismatch creates a profitable opportunity for the Authorized Participant.

If ETF demand is high, the basket of assets could be valued greater than the assets themselves. The Authorized Participant can jump at this opportunity to buy the underlying assets and trade them in to create more ETFs (more baskets!). Since they got the assets for cheaper than what they sell the baskets for, they earn a sweet risk-free profit! More sell supply leads to a lower price, so this increase in selling should move the ETF’s price downwards near its true value.

On the other hand, if ETF demand is low, the basket of assets could be valued lower than the assets alone. The Authorized Participant can buy the underpriced baskets from the open market and trade them back to the ETF Provider for the assets alone. Since the assets alone are worth more than the baskets they traded in, the Authorized Participant can sell the assets for a profit. More buy demand leads to a higher price, so this increase in buying should move the ETF's price upwards near its true value.

The Authorized Participant is extremely motivated to take advantage of these opportunities, which is great for maintaining the ETF's price integrity.

Conclusion

ETFs can appear complicated at first. There are quite a few layers to understand, but once you grasp the basics, you realize they're nothing more than baskets!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark.  Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

When Perfect Becomes a Problem: The iCar Story

Let's talk about Apple's iCar, or rather, the ghost of it. A decade. Ten billion dollars. Poof. Gone. Like a puff of smoke from a dream that never quite woke up. They wanted to launch a revolution, a fully-formed, flawless chariot. But revolutions aren't born in secret labs; they're forged in the messy, chaotic crucible of the real world. You don't build a movement by hiding in the shadows. You don't create a product people love by ignoring them. You don't change the world by waiting for perfection. It's about the minimum viable. It's about shipping early, shipping often, and listening—really listening—to the people you're trying to serve. Apple built a cathedral of secrecy. A monument to what might have been. And then, they tore it down.  They spent billions on a dream, while ignoring the simple truth: the market doesn't care about your dreams. It cares about solutions. It cares about things that work. So, here's the lesson: stop chasing...

Why We Shouldn't Be Afraid of Ambiguity

Ambiguity. That fuzzy monster that chases us down darkened hallways, whispering doubts about our roadmap and feature sets. You know the feeling. You constantly wrestle with unknowns: Will users like this? Is this the right direction? Frankly, if you had a nickel for every time the answer wasn't crystal clear, well, you might actually want to chase that ambiguity down the hall. But here's the thing: ambiguity isn't your enemy. It's your dance partner. Innovation rarely happens in a land of perfect clarity. Sure, there's a time for well-defined processes. But when you're creating something new, there are bound to be more questions than answers. The key is to learn to waltz with the unknown .  Embrace the experiment. Don't be afraid to throw some spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks.  Focus on outcomes, not outputs. Don't get hung up on features. What problem are you trying to solve? How will you measure success? Get comfortable with "go...