Skip to main content

What Line Is It Anyways? Groupthink in Finance

Top View Photo Of People Near Wooden Table

In 1951, psychologist Solomon Asch conducted a series of studies to test the impact social pressure has on our decision making.

The study involved presenting groups with two cards. Card 1 had a single line, Card 2 had three.


The group was asked to choose the line on Card 2 that matched the line on Card 1.

Simple enough, but there has to be a twist, right? Yup! Would be a pretty boring study otherwise. Each group was filled with actors, with only one true test subject.

The experiment would begin with a few rounds where everyone would answer correctly. The answer was always obvious. As the test progressed, the actors would start choosing an incorrect option. For example, with lines above, the actors would choose A when the answer was clearly C.

Asch found that social pressure would cause test subjects to conform and select an answer that was obviously wrong. The likelihood to conform being greater the larger the number of actors.

There's been a number of studies demonstrating our tendency to "herd".

One study had actors stand on a street corner looking up at the sky, at literally nothing. When it was only one actor, a few passerby pedestrians would join in on the sky-gazing. Similar to the line experiment, when the number of actors grew, so did the number of conformers.

Our bias to trust the masses can negatively impact our financial decisions. There's a lot of noise out there. People telling us that you'll get rich by buying certain stocks, or that real estate is best investment. It's easy to default to the wisdom of the crowd, it's especially enticing when others have done well.

Investors blindly following the crowd is what creates bubbles. It happened in 2000, when investors dove into internet stocks, it happened in 2017 with Bitcoin. It never ends well. 

The input from others should only be one data point. Everyone has a unique situation, different goals, different tolerances for risk. What everyone else is doing might not be right for you. Definitely learn from others but don't forget, you're an individual and your milage might vary.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark.  Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

Starting Really Really Small

On your desk is one of the most intimidating sights known to man. A blank page. The prospect of filling it up with anything resembling decent seems insurmountable. Staring at the long road ahead fills you with anxiety and dread.  The first step is the most difficult. So we procrastinate. We " research ", we " prep ", we " plan ". We do everything except tackling the problem. We avoid the pain for as long as we can.  To make a blank page less intimidating. Tear it in half. There, half as scary, twice as easy. Still too much? Do it again. And again. Keep doing it until the task is so small that it's too easy not to do.  Getting starting is the hardest part. So make the hardest part as easy as possible. This doesn't guarantee amazing results, but it gets you in the game. You can't win if you don't play.  

Why We Shouldn't Be Afraid of Ambiguity

Ambiguity. That fuzzy monster that chases us down darkened hallways, whispering doubts about our roadmap and feature sets. You know the feeling. You constantly wrestle with unknowns: Will users like this? Is this the right direction? Frankly, if you had a nickel for every time the answer wasn't crystal clear, well, you might actually want to chase that ambiguity down the hall. But here's the thing: ambiguity isn't your enemy. It's your dance partner. Innovation rarely happens in a land of perfect clarity. Sure, there's a time for well-defined processes. But when you're creating something new, there are bound to be more questions than answers. The key is to learn to waltz with the unknown .  Embrace the experiment. Don't be afraid to throw some spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks.  Focus on outcomes, not outputs. Don't get hung up on features. What problem are you trying to solve? How will you measure success? Get comfortable with "go...