Skip to main content

Leveraged ETFs For Buy-&-Hold Investors?

Image
By








Leverage is powerful. It's even been argued that it should be a consideration for young investors. Given all the hype, buy-and-hold investors are trying to figure out how to get in on the action. ETFs are great, so would leveraged ETFs be even better?

First, What Are Leveraged ETFs?

Traditional ETFs look to match the returns of an index, leveraged ETFs look to amplify them.

 SPY, a traditional index ETF is designed to match the returns of the S&P 500, SPXL, a tripled levered ETF looks to 3X them!

This is achieved through the use of debt and derivatives. The math to enable this is rather complicated and can leave you scratching your head.

Long Term Leveraged Investing

Over the long term, markets have historically returned about 10% a year. If we used a leveraged ETF, couldn't we get 30%? If this sounds too good to be true, because it is.

ETFs like SPXL do provide 3X returns, but only for a single day. Leverage ETFs are rebalanced daily, meaning the tracking will melt away for any period beyond that. This causes wild performance gaps between a levered and traditional ETF following the same index.

Let's say on Monday, at market open you invest $300 into 1 share of SPY and $300 into 1 share of SPXL.

Monday: 

The S&P 500 rises 10% 

SPY = 300 + 10% =  $330 
SPYXL =  300 + 30% = $390 

Tuesday: 

The S&P 500 drops 10% 

SPY = $330 - 10% = $297
SPYXL = $390 - 10% = $273

 On Monday, SPYXL perfectly replicated a 3X return of the index, hooray! However, when held for an additional day, you start to see the decay.

Over the two day period, the S&P 500 dropped in value by 1% ( $300 to $297). Logically, you'd think SPXL dropped by 3%.

In practice, SPXL dropped by a whopping 9% ($300 to $273). In only two days, the decay lead to such a wild deviation from the underlying index. It'll only get worse over time.

Keep It Simple

Leveraged ETFs were not built for buy-and-hold investors. These were made for speculators who want to trade in and out of the market. Unlike with traditional ETFs, you can't truly be passive. You'll need to constantly monitor your position (or risk losing a ton). 

Fees are also a factor. Given all complexity involved in levered products, they cost a lot more to manage. SPY has an expense ratio of 0.0945%, while SPYXL costs 1.01%. That's more than 10 times the price!

When it comes to long term investing, it's best to keep it simple. 







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Today's Special: Humble Pie

By
You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark.  Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Starting Really Really Small

By
On your desk is one of the most intimidating sights known to man. A blank page. The prospect of filling it up with anything resembling decent seems insurmountable. Staring at the long road ahead fills you with anxiety and dread.  The first step is the most difficult. So we procrastinate. We " research ", we " prep ", we " plan ". We do everything except tackling the problem. We avoid the pain for as long as we can.  To make a blank page less intimidating. Tear it in half. There, half as scary, twice as easy. Still too much? Do it again. And again. Keep doing it until the task is so small that it's too easy not to do.  Getting starting is the hardest part. So make the hardest part as easy as possible. This doesn't guarantee amazing results, but it gets you in the game. You can't win if you don't play.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Why We Shouldn't Be Afraid of Ambiguity

By
Ambiguity. That fuzzy monster that chases us down darkened hallways, whispering doubts about our roadmap and feature sets. You know the feeling. You constantly wrestle with unknowns: Will users like this? Is this the right direction? Frankly, if you had a nickel for every time the answer wasn't crystal clear, well, you might actually want to chase that ambiguity down the hall. But here's the thing: ambiguity isn't your enemy. It's your dance partner. Innovation rarely happens in a land of perfect clarity. Sure, there's a time for well-defined processes. But when you're creating something new, there are bound to be more questions than answers. The key is to learn to waltz with the unknown .  Embrace the experiment. Don't be afraid to throw some spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks.  Focus on outcomes, not outputs. Don't get hung up on features. What problem are you trying to solve? How will you measure success? Get comfortable with "go...
Post a Comment
Read more