Leveraged ETFs For Buy-&-Hold Investors?

Leverage is powerful. It's even been argued that it should be a consideration for young investors. Given all the hype, buy-and-hold investors are trying to figure out how to get in on the action. ETFs are great, so would leveraged ETFs be even better?

First, What Are Leveraged ETFs?

Traditional ETFs look to match the returns of an index, leveraged ETFs look to amplify them.

SPY, a traditional index ETF is designed to match the returns of the S&P 500, SPXL, a tripled levered ETF looks to 3X them!

This is achieved through the use of debt and derivatives. The math to enable this is rather complicated and can leave you scratching your head.

Long Term Leveraged Investing

Over the long term, markets have historically returned about 10% a year. If we used a leveraged ETF, couldn't we get 30%? If this sounds too good to be true, because it is.

ETFs like SPXL do provide 3X returns, but only for a single day. Leverage ETFs are rebalanced daily, meaning the tracking will melt away for any period beyond that. This causes wild performance gaps between a levered and traditional ETF following the same index.

Let's say on Monday, at market open you invest $300 into 1 share of SPY and $300 into 1 share of SPXL.

Monday:

The S&P 500 rises 10%

SPY = 300 + 10% = $330
SPYXL = 300 + 30% = $390

Tuesday:

The S&P 500 drops 10%

SPY = $330 - 10% = $297
SPYXL = $390 - 10% = $273

On Monday, SPYXL perfectly replicated a 3X return of the index, hooray! However, when held for an additional day, you start to see the decay.

Over the two day period, the S&P 500 dropped in value by 1% ( $300 to $297). Logically, you'd think SPXL dropped by 3%.

In practice, SPXL dropped by a whopping 9% ($300 to $273). In only two days, the decay lead to such a wild deviation from the underlying index. It'll only get worse over time.

Keep It Simple

Leveraged ETFs were not built for buy-and-hold investors. These were made for speculators who want to trade in and out of the market. Unlike with traditional ETFs, you can't truly be passive. You'll need to constantly monitor your position (or risk losing a ton).

Fees are also a factor. Given all complexity involved in levered products, they cost a lot more to manage. SPY has an expense ratio of 0.0945%, while SPYXL costs 1.01%. That's more than 10 times the price!

When it comes to long term investing, it's best to keep it simple.

Comments

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark. Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Starting Really Really Small

On your desk is one of the most intimidating sights known to man. A blank page. The prospect of filling it up with anything resembling decent seems insurmountable. Staring at the long road ahead fills you with anxiety and dread. The first step is the most difficult. So we procrastinate. We " research ", we " prep ", we " plan ". We do everything except tackling the problem. We avoid the pain for as long as we can. To make a blank page less intimidating. Tear it in half. There, half as scary, twice as easy. Still too much? Do it again. And again. Keep doing it until the task is so small that it's too easy not to do. Getting starting is the hardest part. So make the hardest part as easy as possible. This doesn't guarantee amazing results, but it gets you in the game. You can't win if you don't play.

Herman Ye

Search