ETF-Ception: ETFs of ETFs

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are exploding in popularity. Driven by the rise of passive investing, the industry is not only getting bigger but more innovative. ETFs used to simply hold a basket of stocks, now we have ETFs that hold other ETFs!

How Do They Work?

Classic ETFs hold securities to replicate an index. ETFs of ETFs takes it up a notch. Instead of holding stocks or bonds directly, they hold other ETFs. A fund of funds.

Take for example XEQT, iShares' Core Equity ETF. It doesn't own any stocks directly. Instead it holds 4 ETFs that between them own thousands of stocks.

What's The Point?

Diversification and convenience.

XEQT allows you to own a global portfolio within a single fund. It holds a Canadian (XIC), US (ITOT), International (XEF) and Emerging Markets (IEMG) ETF, all wrapped up in a neat package.

Previously to get this level of exposure, you would have to combine and juggle multiple ETFs yourself.

What you gain in connivence, you pay for in a slightly higher fee. Directly buying the underlying ETFs is cheaper. Less layers, less fees.

Also you give up flexibility. For keen DIYers, individual ETFs allow you to better tweak and optimize your portfolio.

Wouldn't I be Paying Fees Twice?

XEQT has a fee. The underlying ETFs also have fees. So am I being charged twice?
Simple answer is no. ETF providers are not allowed to double dip. You only pay a single fee.

Again, the fee will be slightly larger than if you bought the underlying ETFs directly, so in a way you're paying for it.

Conclusion

ETFs of ETFs can seem complex at first but they actually makes things simpler. The structure paved the way for all-in-on funds like XEQT. Making investing in a diversified portfolio as convenient as mutual funds with the low fees of ETFs. The best of both worlds.

Comments

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark. Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

Starting Really Really Small

On your desk is one of the most intimidating sights known to man. A blank page. The prospect of filling it up with anything resembling decent seems insurmountable. Staring at the long road ahead fills you with anxiety and dread. The first step is the most difficult. So we procrastinate. We " research ", we " prep ", we " plan ". We do everything except tackling the problem. We avoid the pain for as long as we can. To make a blank page less intimidating. Tear it in half. There, half as scary, twice as easy. Still too much? Do it again. And again. Keep doing it until the task is so small that it's too easy not to do. Getting starting is the hardest part. So make the hardest part as easy as possible. This doesn't guarantee amazing results, but it gets you in the game. You can't win if you don't play.

Why We Shouldn't Be Afraid of Ambiguity

Ambiguity. That fuzzy monster that chases us down darkened hallways, whispering doubts about our roadmap and feature sets. You know the feeling. You constantly wrestle with unknowns: Will users like this? Is this the right direction? Frankly, if you had a nickel for every time the answer wasn't crystal clear, well, you might actually want to chase that ambiguity down the hall. But here's the thing: ambiguity isn't your enemy. It's your dance partner. Innovation rarely happens in a land of perfect clarity. Sure, there's a time for well-defined processes. But when you're creating something new, there are bound to be more questions than answers. The key is to learn to waltz with the unknown . Embrace the experiment. Don't be afraid to throw some spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks. Focus on outcomes, not outputs. Don't get hung up on features. What problem are you trying to solve? How will you measure success? Get comfortable with "go...

Herman Ye

Search