Skip to main content

How Accurate Are Analyst Price Targets?

Analyst targets in theory can streamline a lot of trade decisions. Target price is higher than the current price? BUY! Oh, if only it was that easy. 

A 2012 study of 11,000 analysts from 41 countries found target accuracy to be fairly low. 18% for 3-month and 12% for 12-month price targets.

There are a number of reasons for the low success-rate. 

1) Targets are based on point-in-time information. Predictions get stale fast when information changes - this happens often.

2) Conflict of interest is a concern. Analyst who have a vested interest in a stock might be bias. If you owned Tesla, you might be swayed to give a generous target. 

3) There's no standard for how price targets are achieved. Every analyst has their own models and methods. Results can vary wildly. 

4) There's no accountability. Analyst can be completely off and simply revise their target. No sweat off their backs. 

5) Markets are volatile, especially in the short-term. They can swing for no reason. Markets are made up of us unpredictable beings. No matter how much data you have, it's hard to know what we're thinking. 

6) And most importantly, no one can predict the future. 

It's understood amongst professionals that targets aren't truth. They're simply a signal. A way to sense how Wall Street is feeling about a stock. It's an interesting data point but not something you trust at face value. Next time you see an opportune price target, think twice before diving in. 


Popular posts from this blog

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event.  Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback.  Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes. 

ELI5: The Stock Market

Today we get back to basics and answer some of the most common questions about the stock market.

Step One is Knowing

In school, we listen to our teachers. At home, our parents. Throughout our childhood, following instructions is praised and rewarded. When we're young, there's value in this. We don't understand how the world works quite yet, so guidance can be lifesaving.  The bias to just accept obviously has drawbacks. Insert old jumping off a bridge adage .  This conditioning is especially strong for kids from lower income households. Their parents are more likely in working class jobs involving strict order-taking. Parents of middle-class households tend to be knowledge workers where influence is essential.  Studies have shown kids from middle-income households are more willing to negotiable with their teachers. They learn from their parents that things are not set in stone. This leads to better grades and learning outcomes when compared to their lower income counterparts who don't negotiable.  In business, if we simply accept things as they are, we would never innovate. In work, w