The Wrong Lesson From GameStop

Newcomers rushed to open a brokerage account last month. Fuelled by the craziness of GameStop, folks jumped into the markets head first. A get-rich-quick scheme paired with a David Vs. Goliath story, this brought investing to the mainstream. Retail investors turned thousands into millions, all while hurting hedge funds in the process. Make money and tackle inequality? How could anyone resist?

Driven by emotions and momentum, this was a speculative bubble that was destined to snap back to reality (oh there goes gravity). A lot of people are now losing money and are screaming foul at the rich for rigging the game.

A terrible first impression. Why invest when they can change the just rules? This is the wrong lesson.

Does the stock market favour the rich? Yes. They have faster computers and better information. But if you put down your broad brush you'll see the stock market is a great way for everyone to build wealth.

Pros might have advantages but they don't have complete control. If they did, they would perform better. Instead, they by and large underperform the market.

We have one key advantage. We can play the long game. Hedge funds need to show results every quarter, we don't. They need to take outsized risks and trade excessively to prove their worth, not us.

Despite the current narrative, investing has never been more democratized. It's practically free to get our fair share of market returns with index funds.

If you lost money it's not because investing is broken. You weren't investing. You were gambling.

This wasn't rich vs poor, it was early vs. late. A game of musical chairs where there was a million players to each seat. Don't get fooled - not by the rich, not by folks on Reddit. None of them care about your financial goals.

If you truly want to grow your wealth and not play into a losing game - keep your fees low, trade less and invest for the long term. Don't lose faith in the stock market because of this, it'll only cost you more.

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

ELI5: The Stock Market

Today we get back to basics and answer some of the most common questions about the stock market.

Step One is Knowing

In school, we listen to our teachers. At home, our parents. Throughout our childhood, following instructions is praised and rewarded. When we're young, there's value in this. We don't understand how the world works quite yet, so guidance can be lifesaving. The bias to just accept obviously has drawbacks. Insert old jumping off a bridge adage . This conditioning is especially strong for kids from lower income households. Their parents are more likely in working class jobs involving strict order-taking. Parents of middle-class households tend to be knowledge workers where influence is essential. Studies have shown kids from middle-income households are more willing to negotiable with their teachers. They learn from their parents that things are not set in stone. This leads to better grades and learning outcomes when compared to their lower income counterparts who don't negotiable. In business, if we simply accept things as they are, we would never innovate. In work, w

Herman Ye

Search